Posted On: November 4, 2006 by Christopher T. Hurley

Caps on medical malpractice awards are not the answer

Next time a corporate CEO calls to cap damages for medical malpractice victims point out the absurd growth of CEO pay that has no relationship to corporate stock performance. How is it that only the people whose lives have been destroyed by negligence have to settle for caps?



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The pay packages of U.S. chief executives are outpacing investor returns, suggesting that their compensation is not based on performance, according to a report published Monday.

The survey conducted and reported by the Financial Times, which looked at compensation of chief executives of companies in the S&P 500 index, revealed that the median compensation for a CEO rose 20 percent to $5 million during the past fiscal year.

That tops both the net profit and shareholder returns of those same companies, which rose 15 percent and 9 percent respectively, according to the paper.

"The reality is that this is a false market driven not by appreciation in the share price and earnings but by what other chief executives are getting," Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, told the FT.

Experts told the paper that the survey, which looked at the salary, bonuses and options exercised by chief executives over the past two years, also indicates that their compensation packages are increasing at a much faster pace than the pay of the average worker.