August 21, 2007

Illinois Moves to Limit Hospital Infections

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin reports that the Illinois Legislature has taken steps to reduce hospital infections. As an Illinois medical malpractice firm we have handled many cases involving MRSA and it is a nasty bug. Steps to limit its spread are long overdue:

SPRINGFIELD — Illinois health care facilities must immediately begin testing patients for a drug-resistant bacterium, under a new law aimed at reducing the spread of infections

Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich signed two bills Monday — both effective immediately — requiring a slew of regulations for health facilities in an effort to control infections such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA.

The superbug, spread by touch, generally cannot be treated by common antibiotics and can cause blood infections, pneumonia and other illnesses. MRSA usually thrives in environments, like hospitals, where people have open wounds.

Illinois is one of the first states to require hospitals to test all patients in intensive-care units for MRSA and to confine those with the infection. Health providers also must wash their hands and wear masks and gloves when treating infected patients.

Bookmark: Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at del.icio.us Digg Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at Digg.com Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at Spurl.net Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at Simpy.com Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at NewsVine Blink this Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at blinklist.com Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at Furl.net Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at reddit.com Fark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at Fark.com Bookmark Illinois%20Moves%20to%20Limit%20Hospital%20Infections at Yahoo! MyWeb

August 20, 2007

Medicare Will Not Cover Hospital Errors

Robert Pear of the New York Times reports:

In a significant policy change, Bush administration officials say that Medicare will no longer pay the extra costs of treating preventable errors, injuries and infections that occur in hospitals, a move they say could save lives and millions of dollars.

Private insurers are considering similar changes, which they said could multiply the savings and benefits for patients.

Under the new rules, to be published next week, Medicare will not pay hospitals for the costs of treating certain “conditions that could reasonably have been prevented.”

Among the conditions that will be affected are bedsores, or pressure ulcers; injuries caused by falls; and infections resulting from the prolonged use of catheters in blood vessels or the bladder.

If medicare and private insurance will not pay for these errors then who do you think will be paying? This new initiative leaves the injured party as the likely target to pay these bills. As I understand it the Bush administration has been working tirelessly to limit the rights of injured people to recover their damages in court and now they are saying medicare will not pay either.

Bookmark: Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at del.icio.us Digg Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at Digg.com Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at Spurl.net Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at Simpy.com Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at NewsVine Blink this Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at blinklist.com Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at Furl.net Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at reddit.com Fark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at Fark.com Bookmark Medicare%20Will%20Not%20Cover%20Hospital%20Errors at Yahoo! MyWeb

August 14, 2007

Nursing Home to Pay $54M For Resident Who Bled to Death

As a Chicago Nursing Home lawyer I do not find this verdict surprising:

In the largest personal injury verdict in state history, a New Mexico jury awarded $54 million to the family of a woman who bled to death in her nursing home. The plaintiff's lawyer, Carl Bettinger of Albuquerque, was already well-acquainted with the defendant, having previously litigated more than half a dozen similar negligence trials against Manor Care, a nursing home chain based in Toledo, Ohio. After a two-and-a-half week trial, jurors found Manor Care liable for negligence and attempting to cover up the cause of death of 78-year-old resident Barbara Barber.”

Justin Rebello, Lawyers USA 8/03/07

Bookmark: Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at del.icio.us Digg Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at Digg.com Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at Spurl.net Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at Simpy.com Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at NewsVine Blink this Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at blinklist.com Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at Furl.net Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at reddit.com Fark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at Fark.com Bookmark Nursing%20Home%20to%20Pay%20%2454M%20For%20Resident%20Who%20Bled%20to%20Death at Yahoo! MyWeb

August 14, 2007

Illinois Medical Malpractice victims beware

“If you're going to be killed accidentally during surgery, it might be better for your relatives if it happens outside of Texas. ‘This is also a bad place to be maimed by a doctor,’ said Paula Sweeney, a Dallas medical malpractice lawyer who has seen her business evaporate since 2003 state legislation that limited personal-injury lawsuits, especially those against doctors and hospitals. Sweeney said many people who believe they were injured by medical negligence no longer can have their day in court because of the legislation, pushed by Republican lawmakers and approved on a statewide ballot.”

Mary Flood, Houston Chronicle 8/06/07

http://www.hurley-law.com/lawyer-attorney-1154596.html

Bookmark: Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at del.icio.us Digg Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at Digg.com Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at Spurl.net Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at Simpy.com Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at NewsVine Blink this Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at blinklist.com Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at Furl.net Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at reddit.com Fark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at Fark.com Bookmark Illinois%20Medical%20Malpractice%20victims%20beware at Yahoo! MyWeb

August 14, 2007

$5.5 Million for Death From Pain Patch

“In the first federal pain patch trial, a Florida jury awarded $5.5 million to the father of a 28-year-old man who died at his computer while wearing a Duragesic patch. It was the second victory in as many tries for the plaintiffs' bar, with a $772,000 win in Texas state court last summer. (See ‘Leaky pain patch yields $772,000 verdict,’ Lawyers USA, Aug. 14, 2006. Search terms for Lawyers USA Archives: White and Duragesic.) Although the jury declined to award punitive damages, the verdict bodes well for future patch cases, said Dallas attorney Jim Orr, who tried the federal case. More than 50 wrongful death suits have already been filed. Duragesic pain patches, manufactured by Alza Corp. and Janssen Pharmaceutica, subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson, have faced regulatory scrutiny and litigation since February 2004, when a recall was issued because of patch leaks. The recall was expanded later that year to more than 2 million patches, and the FDA is continuing to investigate 120 deaths among patch users.”

Correy E. Stephenson, Lawyers USA 8/03/07

Bookmark: Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at del.icio.us Digg %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at Digg.com Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at Spurl.net Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at Simpy.com Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at NewsVine Blink this %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at blinklist.com Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at Furl.net Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at reddit.com Fark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at Fark.com Bookmark %245.5%20Million%20for%20Death%20From%20Pain%20Patch at Yahoo! MyWeb

August 6, 2007

Illinois Appellate Court affirms Hurley McKenna & Mertz negligent credentialing trial victory against hospital

The Illinois Appellate Court has affirmed the largest known verdict for a plaintiff in an institutional negligence case ever obtained in Illinois. The case is also the first reported case in Illinois dealing with a hospital's liability for negligently credentialing a physician, podiatrist or other health care provider. Christopher T. Hurley and Mark R. McKenna of Hurley McKenna & Mertz obtained the $7,775,668 verdict in August of 2004 for their client, a long-time critical care nurse who went to Silver Cross Hospital in Joliet, Illinois for removal of a bunion on her left foot. Dr. Paul Kirchner, a podiatrist with surgical privileges at Silver Cross Hospital, performed the procedure, known as a bunionectomy, in spite of the fact that the patient had a diabetic ulcer present at the site of the bunion. Diabetic ulcers are a known source of infections, and podiatric standards generally require that an elective surgery such as a bunionectomy be delayed until the ulcer is completely healed.

During the original trial, the jury heard testimony that Dr. Kirchner made an incision near the diabetic ulcer, and placed a screw in patient's left foot. As a result, the bones in patient's left foot at the site of the screw became severely infected. No attempt was made to remove the infected screw until February of 1999 at Silver Cross Hospital, and trial testimony indicated that Dr. Kirchner was unable to remove the screw at that time because of his alleged lack of proper surgical training.

As a consequence of the negligent October, 1998, left foot surgery at Silver Cross Hospital, the bones in the patient's left foot became so infected that she was forced to undergo the amputation of her left foot. The patient has been unable to return to work as a nurse since the surgery.

During the case, Hurley and McKenna presented evidence to the jury that Silver Cross Hospital granted hospital privileges to Dr. Kirchner in 1992 contrary to the hospital’s own by-laws. The hospital’s by-laws required all podiatrists seeking surgical privileges at the hospital to have completed either a 12-month podiatric surgical residency program, or be board-certified by the American Board of Podiatric Surgery. Dr. Kirchner met neither of these requirements in 1992, when he initially began performing procedures at Silver Cross Hospital, or in 1998, when he performed surgery on the patient. During that time period Dr. Kirchner re-applied several times for continuation of his surgical privileges at Silver Cross Hospital, and each time the hospital’s Board of Trustees granted the privileges in violation of its own rules and by-laws.

Illinois law requires hospitals to use reasonable care to determine the qualifications of health care professionals added to a hospital’s medical staff. A hospital's failure to use reasonable care to select and supervise health care professionals to care for patients, which leads to serious injury, can give rise to a claim for institutional negligence.

In this case the jury agreed that podiatrist Dr. Kirchner was professionally negligent in performing the surgery and failing to properly treat the foot infection, and that Silver Cross Hospital was negligent in giving hospital privileges to Dr. Kirchner to perform the surgery in the first place.

You can read the Illinois Appellate Court's opinion here.

Chicago-based Hurley McKenna & Mertz, founded in 1991, is devoted solely to the representation of severely injured persons. The firm has tried and settled hundreds of cases, and obtained numerous multi-million dollar verdicts. If you believe you or a loved one has been a victim of institutional negligence by a hospital or health care facility, feel free to contact us at 312/553-4900.


Bookmark: Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at del.icio.us Digg Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at Digg.com Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at Spurl.net Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at Simpy.com Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at NewsVine Blink this Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at blinklist.com Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at Furl.net Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at reddit.com Fark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at Fark.com Bookmark Illinois%20Appellate%20Court%20affirms%20Hurley%20McKenna%20%26%20Mertz%20negligent%20credentialing%20trial%20victory%20against%20hospital at Yahoo! MyWeb

August 3, 2007

Minneapolis bridge collapse demonstrates that tort immunity leads to complacency

The I-35W Bridge collapse in Minneapolis that tort immunity that shields states and municipalities from liability for negligence leads to complacency, neglect and disaster.
Citizens assumed that teams of qualified professionals made sure the bridge was safe for use and would not fail--or that we would be warned if it was dangerous to use the bridge. The bridge was not safe, the state's professionals knew it, yet no warnings came.

The same people who knew of the danger of the bridge, and did nothing, will likely never be held accountable for their complacency, due to state tort immunities which protect state officials from negligence claims. The only ones who will pay for this lack of responsibility are the friends and loved ones of those who died or were injured in the collapse.

Tort immunity, a concept that shields governments from liability in injury cases, may prevent those injured and the families of those killed from ever obtaining justice in this tragedy. After the recovery effort has finished, and the investigations are complete, talented lawyers will try vigorously to hold the responsible governmental and private entities accountable. Hopefully tort immunity will not block their efforts.

Efforts at protecting people and companies whose actions can kill and injure, commonly called tort reform and tort immunity, serve only to breed complacency and sanction irresponsible behavior. Tort reform and tort immunity are bad for everyone. The lawyers at my firm remain committed to the fight against tort reform.

Bookmark: Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at del.icio.us Digg Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at Digg.com Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at Spurl.net Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at Simpy.com Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at NewsVine Blink this Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at blinklist.com Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at Furl.net Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at reddit.com Fark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at Fark.com Bookmark Minneapolis%20bridge%20collapse%20demonstrates%20that%20tort%20immunity%20leads%20to%20complacency at Yahoo! MyWeb